I am struck by the resurgence in the peace movement in the last few weeks and its implications for Unitarian Universalism. We have lived with a contradiction in our principles and purposes for nearly thirty years, and we should at least acknowledge it, learn what it has to teach us.
We assert in the Principles and Purposes that among the sources of our living tradition we count the "[w]ords and deeds of prophetic women and men which challenge us to confront powers and structures of evil with justice, compassion, and the transforming power of love." For the many, many Unitarian Universalists who have traveled to Crawford, Texas, attended vigils, wrote letters to the editor, lit candles in church, and said a prayer of gratitude, Cindy Sheehan and the other Gold Star Parents against the war are prophets. The Southern Christian Leadership Council who knows courageous witness when they see it has been mobilizing support and sending delegations to Texas.
Yet, in our Principles and Purposes we also asset that we cherish the use of the democratic process, and we might be tempted to extend that principle to selecting prophets. But if that is the case, who choose Cindy Sheehan? She is certainly an embarrassment to the political class. Those among us who see the contest between Democrats and Republicans as crucial will argue that she is not a good spokesperson for "our side." We should look to more responsible members of the opposition party, such as Hilary Clinton.
I invite you to consider a Unitarian Universalist congregation, what if they decided to call a prophet? They would take a survey, they would elect a search committee, they would look at a number of available candidates. We can be sure that they would not want someone who would cause internal dissension. She would never swear, make divisive statements about foreign policy, and her program for action would be realistic. A prophet with naïve ideas about immediate disengagement from evil, impeachment of the king, and other such pronouncements wouldn't make the cut. If we choose a prophet by the democratic process she would look a lot like a member of our Unitarian Universalist clergy - a facilitator of process, teacher of wisdom, professional institution builder, but not a prophet. (I protest that some of us retire, and become prophets, and some of us do become community ministers, but then I confess that most of us are caretakers of the unity of our congregations, a role in contradiction with pronouncing justice.)
Thanks to James Luther Adams we believe in the prophethood of all believers, and it is among the unchosen laity that we witness prophecy in our midst. In my experience as an institutional manager, when prophets arise within the congregation, they are uncommonly disruptive, they raise challenging questions, and they have a lousy sense of timing. I love my prophets, but at a distance.
So, it is good that we do not choose our prophets by any democratic process. The ancient tradition gave us the story that prophets are called by God. That explanation does have possibilities for progressives. Liberation theologians argue that God prefers the poor and powerless against the rich and the powerful. Judgement for the liberation theologian would look a lot like popular revolt.
For those of us with a more incarnate, embodied divinity, prophets arise when human beings seek to be in right relationship with each other, and find the social and political arrangements of their time to be corrupt, violent, and dehumanizing. The prophetic woman or man being an embodied person will experience these dysfunctions as immoral, as violations of their deepest values, and respond with anger. Being human they will respond emotionally, and convey that raw, irrational emotion to all who behold their witness. Rage not rational calculation is the mark of the prophet. And because of that emotional response, she will tap into the anger that lies in the hearts of many of her contemporaries who will experience the prophet speaking for their deepest values, their ultimate concerns. They will experience her as embodying their own anger and hatred for wrong doing, corruption, and misuse of power. And she will call forth many others to prophecy.
It is all so messy and so unpredictable. No well managed search committee would choose such a person. And the King will be embarrassed, and the rivals of the King will annoyed, but the spirit "bloweth where it listeth...and maketh all things new."
Image from Salt Lake 08-22-04